Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle

Jon Rappoport Infowars.com March 2, 2013

Perhaps you remember the ill-fated Just-Label-It campaign.  A number of activist groups petitioned the FDA for a federal regulation that would make labeling GMO food mandatory.

The petition amassed over a million signatures.  But the FDA decided only 394 of these were legitimate, because all the others were electronically submitted in one document.

Infuriating?  Of course.  But that was nothing.  Let’s get down to the core of the crime.

Imagine this.  A killer is put on trial, and the jury, in a surprise verdict, finds him not guilty.  Afterwards, reporters interview this killer.  He says, “The jury freed me.  It’s up to them.  They decide.  That’s what is justice is all about.”

Then the press moves along to members of the jury, who say: Well, we had to take the defendant’s word.  He said he was innocent, so that’s what we ruled.

That’s an exact description of the FDA and Monsanto partnership.

When you cut through the verbiage that surrounded the introduction of GMO food into America, you arrive at two key statements.  One from Monsanto and one from the FDA, the agency responsible for overseeing, licensing, and certifying new food varieties as safe.

Quoted in the New York Times Magazine (October 25, 1998, “Playing God in the Garden”), Philip Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications, famously stated: “Monsanto shouldn’t have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food.  Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible.  Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.”

From the Federal Register, Volume 57, No.104, “Statement of [FDA] Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties,” here is what the FDA had to say on this matter: “Ultimately, it is the food producer who is responsible for assuring safety.”

The direct and irreconcilable clash of these two statements is no accident.  It’s not a sign of incompetence or sloppy work or a mistake or a miscommunication.  It’s a clear signal that the fix was in.

Passing the buck back and forth was the chilling and arrogant strategy through which Pandora’s box was pried opened and GMO food was let into the US food supply.

In order for this titanic scam to work, the media had to cooperate.  Reporters had to be a) idiots and b)sell-outs.

With few exceptions, reporters and their editors let the story rest there, as a “he said-he said” issue.  No sane principled journalist would have cut bait at that point, but who said mainstream reporters are sane or principled?

Underneath the Monsanto-FDA buck-passing act, there was a conscious deal to give a free pass to GMO crops.  This had nothing to do with science or health or “feeding the world.”  It was about profits.  It was also about establishing a new monopoly on food.

Not only would big agribusiness dominate the planet’s food supply, it would strengthen its stranglehold through patents on novel types of seeds which were technologically engineered.

It’s very much like saying, “A cob of corn is not a plant, it’s a machine, and we own the rights to every one of those yellow machines.”

join the inforwars team
Join The Infowars Team

How was Monsanto able to gather so much clout?

 

READ THE REST HERE

JOIN THE INFOWARS TEAM HERE

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s